Skip to main content

Trump fires Michael Flynn

The dismissal of Michael Flynn as Donald Trump’s National Security Advisor last night raises some interesting questions, although the CNN report did not raise those that seem most important to me this morning. 

What prompted Flynn’s dismissal was his claim that he did not discuss conversations with Russian officials with Vice President Mike Pence after the November election; this raised questions about Flynn and the Trump relationship with Russia during the election, although this wasn’t discussed in the CNN report that I saw this morning.  

It is now clear that Flynn did discuss security issues with Russia; as National Security Advisor he would hardly have done so without the knowledge of President Trump, or so it would seem.  What does this say about American-Russian relations at the time of the November presidential election?

When I got up on the morning of November 11 my wife told me that Trump had been elected president, although Hillary Clinton had been considered the favored candidate for that office.  What happened?  There had been reports in the news of strange happenings that, I assumed, had been prompted by Russian sources.  Subsequent reports validated this contention; Russian sources dispensed information through American media that, it seemed to me, contributed to the election of Donald Trump as American president.  This was consistent with reports that Trump was on favorable terms with Russia; Russian secret sources dispensed information in America that helped Donald Trump become president of the United States. 

Hillary Clinton fell from the news almost instantly; the woman who was supposed to become the American president did not achieve that goal; the spotlight is now on Donald Trump and his political team.   Which no longer includes Michael Flynn.   In this narrative Russia seems to have played a critical role; we don’t know how it happened but it is hard for me to imagine that Vladimir Putin was outside the scenario.  The impact on America is already great; Trump has had to accept Russian complicity in events that surfaced at the time of the November 2016 election; American politics have changed immeasurably since Donald Trump was elected President.   


Popular posts from this blog

Reflecting on my blogs at the Times Union

I have just read through my blogs, which began in 2009; this is when Michael Huber, a graduate student at UAlbany, asked me if I would like to write blogs for the Albany Times Union.  I told Michael that I didn’t know what blogs were; he replied that that didn’t make any difference; if I was interested I could write them and email them to him; he would post them.  I don’t know how many I have written; perhaps it was 150 or 200. 
Michael left his position at the Times Union a few months ago; I retired from UAlbany in 2013 and now live in retirement in Florida, but I continued to write blogs  until Michael retired.  He spent a few days’ vacation here when he retired; he stayed with his sister, her husband, and their children. I regret to say that I have lost contact with him since I saw him here. I have just read through  all of my blogs several times; doing so has driven home to me how much they have meant to me.
The woman who took Michael’s position with the Times Union notified me t…

Barnum and Bailey Circus

I don’t know if the forthcoming demise of the Barnum and Bailey and Ringling Circus was reported in Albany, but it certainly was in Sarasota, Florida, where I, a former Albanian, now live.  This is where John Ringling, who became head of the circus, lived; this is where the Ringling Museum, which he founded, is located.  And this is where there is much memorabilia commemorating the circus has been gathered.  John Ringling became head of the Barnum and Bailey and Ringling Circus; he was one of the wealthiest men in America before the 1929 depression.
The story of the Circus begins with Phineas Taylor Barnum (1810-1889), who was born in Bethel, Connecticut; he moved to New York City in 1834; he moved into a house on Hudson Street.  He wrote in an autobiographical account that “I had no pecuniary resources, excepting such as might be derived from debts left for a collection with my agent in Bethel, and I went to the metropolis literally to seek my fortune.”  Someone told him about  a Negr…

Regarding Jane Austen

I was surprised to see a reference to one of my books in yesterday’s Book Review section of the New York Times (7-17-2017):  “In 1979, Warren Roberts produced a thoughtful study called “Jane Austen and the French Revolution.”  The great event is never mentioned in the novels, but it is there, Roberts argues, invisibly woven into the narratives.  Kelly (who wrote the book under review) makes the same point herself to support her “secret radical” thesis.  But Roberts conclusions are cautious.  Kelly’s are adventurous.  Some work better than others.”
My book on Jane Austen came out in 1979; I wrote it after spending a sabbatical year in England in 1970-71.  I had just completed my first book and had no idea what I would do next.  We lived about fifty miles from Steventon, where Austen grew up; I had read her novels and decided to drive to Steventon, even though her village house no longer stood.  But the chapel, just outside the village, still stood; seeing it, being inside it, made a d…